Chatgpt Sebagai Model Psikolinguistik:Sejauh Mana Mesin Memahami Semantik
Main Article Content
Abstract
Focus of this study is the extent to which a computer can understand concepts in human language, hence treating ChatGPT as a model inside psycholinguistics. Designed to replicate the way people understand and generate language, ChatGPT is a type of artificial intelligence. Employing qualitative descriptive approach, this research investigates ChatGPT's semantic capabilities in light of psycholinguistic ideas on language use, meaning, and context. Although ChatGPT can identify semantic patterns and produce suitable responses depending on context, its understanding of meaning is more about associations than it is about real ideas. This means that though the computer simulates language processing, it does not really "understand" meanings as humans do. Although ChatGPT might be used as a simulation tool for psycholinguistic study, the findings reveal that it has not yet attained true semantic understanding.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bender, E. M., & Koller, A. (2020). Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in machines. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the ACL (pp. 5185–5198).
Carroll, S. (2015). Artificial intelligence: How humanlike can machines be? Science, 349(6245), 248–249.
Chomsky, N. (2014). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
Clark, A. (2019). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30(4), 681–694.
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Harvard University Press.
Goldberg, A. (2019). Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press.
Hoff, E. (2013). Language development (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2023). Speech and language processing (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Kearns, M., & Roth, A. (2020). The ethical algorithm. Oxford University Press.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., & Hayashi, H. (2021). Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in NLP. arXiv:2107.13586.
Manning, C. D. (2022). Human language understanding & statistical AI systems. Computational Linguistics, 48(3), 785–799.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. MIT Press.
Miller, G. A. (1995). WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 39–41.
Norvig, P., & Russell, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 technical report. OpenAI.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347.
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. HarperCollins.
Saeed, J. I. (2016). Semantics (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998–6008.
Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language. Academic Press.
Yule, G. (2010). The study of language (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.