Artificial Intelligence sebagai Alternatif Sumber Konsultasi Keagamaan: Telaah Harmonisasi Sains dan Agama terhadap Pergeseran Otoritas Keagamaan di Era Digital
Main Article Content
Abstract
The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly changed the way people access information, including religious knowledge. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of using AI as a source of religious consultation and its implications for the shifting of religious authority within the framework of science and religion harmony. This research employs a qualitative approach using a library research method by analyzing relevant academic literature. The findings indicate that AI is increasingly used as an alternative source for religious consultation due to its accessibility, speed, and user convenience. Furthermore, there is a tendency for a shift in religious authority from traditional sources to algorithm-based digital systems. From the perspective of science and religion harmony, AI is positioned as an instrumental product of scientific development that cannot replace religious authority but serves as a supportive tool in obtaining information. This study emphasizes the importance of religious digital literacy to ensure that the use of AI remains aligned with ethical and religious values.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Apriansyah, A., Hasanah, U., Fauzi, M., & Umi, N. (2026). Islam, Teknologi, Dan Artificial Intelligence: Tantangan Epistemologi, Etika Digital, Dan Otoritas Keagamaan Dalam Konteks Pendidikan Islam. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 11(2), 2548–6950. Retrieved from https://www.preventionweb.net/news/preliminary-report-february-6-2023-earthquakes-turkiye
Arfan, M. A. H., & Hasibuan, S. W. (2025). Pelatihan Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah Dengan Metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR). FUSION: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(2), 104–111.
Aslam, S. (2025). Pergeseran Otoritas Keagamaan Di Era Media Sosial : Tantangan Otentisitas Tafsir Dalam Konten Digital, 03(02), 92–99.
Famuji, U., Malik, A. A., Nurhaidah, S. N., & Fahrany, S. (2026). Research Article Famuji et al . Shifting Religious Authority in the AI Era : A Comparative Study of Gen Z Trust in AI Guidance and Traditional Ulama, 9(1), 82–92.
Hamidalloh, A. S., Thobroni, A. Y., Suyudi, M., Islam, U., & Sunan, N. (2026). ChatGPT as an Algorithmic Epistemic Mediator in Contextual Islamic Religious Education and Religious Moderation, 5(1), 46–61.
Hanifaa, U., & As’ad, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Islamic Education to Develop Students’ Critical Thinking. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies, 26(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v26i4.1610
Nurhamidin, B., Mokodenseho, S., Mokodompit, H., Bahansubu, A., & Rumondor, P. (2025). Transformasi Otoritas Keagamaan Di Era Digital, Analisis Sosiologis Terhadap Pergeseran Pola Otoritas Ulama Di Media Sosial. Al-Muqaddimah, 1(1), 39.
Putri, F. R., & Suharso, A. (2023). Systematic Literature Review Penggunaan Metodologi Pengembangan Sistem Informasi. INFOTECH Journal, 9(2), 377–382. https://doi.org/10.31949/infotech.v9i2.6270
Rifka Alkhilyatul Ma’rifat, I Made Suraharta, I. I. J. (2024). Ethics And Religious Authority In The Age Of Artificial Intelligence: A Study On The Da’wah Narratives Of NU Online Rohman, 2, 306–312.
Rois, C., & Yazdani, G. (2026). Digital Schism: The Reconstruction of Religious Authority and the Emergence of Islamic Knowledge Elite in the AI Era. Surau Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(1), 96–118. https://doi.org/10.63919/surau.v2i1.65
Susanto, N. H. (2017). Reinterpretasi Konsep Bidah Menuju Islam Transformatif. Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 21(2), 235. https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v21i2.523
Uriawan, W., Muhammad, T., & Raihan, A. (2021). Preventing AI Deepfake Abuse: An Islamic Ethics Framework.
Zulfaidah, R., & Hakim, A. (2025). Indonesian Journal of Digital Islamic Studies ( IJDIS ) Algorithmic Religious Authority and the Transformation of Fatwa Legitimacy in Indonesian Digital Muslim Communities, 1(2), 57–74.