Analisis Kritis Masalah Amerika dengan Iran (Board Of Peace): Perspektif Akademis Perdamaian
Main Article Content
Abstract
Tensions between the United States and Iran in 2025 will become one of the most significant geopolitical conflicts affecting the stability of the Middle East region and the global security order. This study aims to critically analyze the dynamics of the 2025 US-Iran conflict through the perspective of peace scholars in Indonesia by examining the roots of the conflict, escalation patterns, and opportunities for a peaceful resolution. The study uses a qualitative approach with a critical analysis design based on library research sourced from international media reports, policy documents, and academic literature on peace studies and international relations. The results show that the 2025 US-Iran conflict reflects the character of a hybrid conflict that combines economic pressure, coercive diplomacy, military threats, and narrative warfare. Analysis using Johan Galtung's peace theory finds a link between direct violence, structural violence, and cultural violence that reinforces the cycle of conflict. Furthermore, the duality of US policy that combines negotiation rhetoric and military pressure has not been able to create sustainable peace, while Iran maintains its bargaining position through strategies of sovereignty and regional resistance. The implications of this research emphasize the importance of a positive peace approach, strengthening multilateral diplomacy, and Indonesia's role as a middle power actor that can encourage dialogue, mediation, and conflict transformation for the sake of creating more sustainable regional and global stability.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alley-Young, G. (2018). Critical Security Studies. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483359922.n105
Bowen, G. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
By the Center for Preventive Action. (2026). Iran’s War With Israel and the United States. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/confrontation-between-united-states-and-iran
Center For Arms. (n.d.). Fact Sheet: The Iran Deal, Then and Now. https://armscontrolcenter.org/the-iran-deal-then-and-now/
CNN. (2025). The US-Iran conflict: A timeline of how we got here. https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2025/06/world/us-iran-conflict-timeline-dg/
crf. (2026). Global Conflict Tracker: Conflict with Iran,. cfr. https://www.cfr.org/
Esposito, J. L. (1999). The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality? Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195130768.001.0001
Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=98BeHFgTK0cC
Kelsey, S. (1971). Arms Control Today. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27361951
Suherry. (2025). Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia di Era Globalisasi: Dinamika, Tantangan, dan Peluang. CV. AZKA PUSTAKA. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=9tSBEQAAQBAJ
Takeyh. (2006). Hidden Iran : paradox and power in the Islamic Republic. https://archive.org/details/hiddeniranparado0000take
Takeyh, R. (2021). The Last Shah. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300264654/the-last-shah/
Tuathail, B. Ó. (2000). Critical Geopolitics. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203973059
Yadwad, K. H. and M. (2025). The road to the Israel-Iran war.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications Design and Methods. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150