Failed Diplomacy to Blame? Cases in Ukraine and Gaza
Main Article Content
Abstract
The conflict and war cases in the international world have become a concern for almost every country in the world due to their impact on the social and economic that has never ending. The conflict resolution theoretically can be done by diplomatic acts involving the conflict either between the conflict parties or by a third party, although this effort does not always end up in a peaceful way. In this case, security cases that still happening in Ukraine and Gaza will become the main study to be discussed due to the biggest impact on the international world. This study aims to explore does failed diplomacy is to blame in the Ukraine and Gaza security cases, which have been on going and have been happening for a long time by employing secondary data through literature review and observation. The result of the study shows that deeper issues like nationalism, ideological differences, and power disparities have produced situations in which diplomacy finds it difficult to be successful. The larger ideological and historical influences influencing these problems are best shown by Israel's Zionist worldview, which frequently conflicts with Palestinian claims, and Russia's historical perception of Ukraine as falling within its sphere of influence.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abdullayev, H. P. (2024). Between Peace and Conflict: The Middle East After the Abraham Accords. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 24(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2024-24-1-40-50
Arbatova, N. (2022). Were the Minsk Agreements doomed to failure? An alternative history. Pathways to Peace and Security, 1, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2022-1-107-120
Casier, T. (2023). No Great Russia without Greater Russia: The Kremlin’s Thinking behind the Invasion of Ukraine. Canadian Journal of European and Russian Studies, 16(2), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.22215/cjers.v16i2.4148
Caucasus Survey. (n.d.). Twenty Years After the Nagorny Karabakh Ceasefire: an Opportunity to Move Towards More Inclusive Conflict Resolution. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2014.11417295
del Sarto, R. A., & Klein, M. (2023). Oslo: Three Decades Later. Israel Studies Review, 38(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3167/isr.2023.380202
Hakim, N., Abi-Ghannam, G., Saab, R., Albzour, M., Zebian, Y., & Adams, G. (2023). Turning the lens in the study of precarity: On experimental social psychology’s acquiescence to the settler-colonial status quo in historic Palestine. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(S1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12595
Hanappi, H. (2022). The Background of the Russian Invasion of Ukraine. MPRA, 112394.
Khairunnisa, B. W. (2021). The Role and Challenges of A Mediator To Resolve The International Conflict in The Digital Era ( Case Study : The Role of OANA ). Journal of Social Science, 2(5), 558–566. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v2i5.199
Lewin, E. (2016). The inevitable dead end of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Cogent Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1227294
Lossovskyi, I. (2019). UKRAINE’S MAIN DIPLOMATIC PRIORITIES IN CONFRONTING RUSSIAN AGGRESSION. Strategic Panaroma, 1(2), 5–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53679/2616-9460.1-2.2019.01
Musthafa, S. (2024). Revisiting Zionism As a State Ideology of Israel: a Critical Examination of the Israel—Palestine Conflict. Jurnal CMES, 17(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.20961/cmes.17.1.53721
NOHRA, F. (2022). the Track Two Diplomacy and Its Contribution To the Israeli Palestinian Oslo Peace Process. Journal of the Belarusian State University, 82(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6848-2022-1-19-30
Palik, J. (2023). The Impact of the Israel-Hamas War on the Saudi-Israeli Normalization Process. PRIO Middle East Centre.
Parmaar, S. S. (2024). Navigating the Crossroads- Understanding the Interconnected Realities of Israel-Palestine. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.19982
Pratiwi, F. I., Syarafi, M. A. R., & Nauvarian, D. (2022). Israeli-Palestinian Conflict beyond Resolution: A Critical Assessment. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 26(2), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.66935
Richter, W. (2022). NATO-Russia Tensions: Putin Orders Invasion of Ukraine. German Institute for International Security Affairs, SWP Commen(16), 1–8.
Rusanti, E., Isman, A. F., Nashrullah, Mansyur, A., & Elzaanin, A. A. A. (2025). Israel-Palestine Conflict : Tracking Global Economic Responses and Fears. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 10(1), 1–19.
Siddiqi, M. U., & Khairunnisa, B. W. (2023). Applying Securitisation Theory to the Ongoing Russia-Ukraine Conflict. Paradigm Shift.
Waldman, S. A. (2011). The Israel-Palestine Conflict: The View From Jerusalem. Journal of International and Global Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.62608/2158-0669.1068
Young, J. C., Young, J. R., & Aubert, B. A. (2022). Insights from diplomacy for the prevention and resolution of conservation conflicts. Conservation Letters, 15(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12891
Zyck, S. A., & Muggah, R. (2012). Preventive diplomacy and conflict prevention: Obstacles and opportunities. Stability, 1(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.ac